This gave me a sense of the relationship between photos and art and a historical aspect of photography – the development of different types such as daguerreotypes, etc. Each artist is represented only once in the selections, so it’s only a glimpse of an artist’s work. I think I would get more out of looking at artists’ works in depth. But it was an interesting overview. Couple of quotes/points:"Since its invention, photography has been the world's ubiquitous picture-making system. It has in the process effected a profound transformation of our knowledge and opinions concerning the structure and meaning of visual experience. Nevertheless, the medium has received little serious study. The commonlaceness of photography, and the radical differences between it and the traditional arts, has made it a refractory problem for theorists, and one that has not submitted with grace to the traditional intellectual apparatus of art historical study. For an art museum, even today, to make a serious commitment to the art of photography requires some imagination, and the willingness to accept some intellectual risks." It is interesting to consider the fact that after Daguerre every man's family acquired a visual past...